- “Don’t be scared, and don’t be impulsive. Be disciplined no matter what the market environment, and keep saving and investing according to your long-term plan,” Kristin Hooper, chief global strategist at Invesco. Source
- “We are reminding clients to keep this in perspective and look to be proactive not reactive to the markets at this time. It is a big emotional test of…risk tolerance; we all want the upside but remember there is downside risk and goals, risk tolerance and time frames must always lead one’s investment decisions.” Jeff Carbone, Managing Partner of Cornerstone Wealth. Source
- On average, there’s been a market correction every year since 1900… Instead of living in fear of corrections, accept them as regular occurrences. Source
- What’s more, the abnormal smoothness of the stock market over the past couple of years set investors up for a shock whenever stocks did fall at least 5%, as they did on Monday. As I pointed out last month, in the low-volatility market we’ve seen until recently, “even slight declines are apt to set off talk of Armageddon, and you will need to focus harder than ever on long-term returns to keep short-term losses from rattling you.” Source
- The Dow is down -0.4% year to date. Source
- And then some people are selling because they aren’t people at all, but software programs that have been programmed to sell when others are selling. Source
- Losses — as in the Dow falling a little more than 7% over the past two trading sessions (including its biggest point drop ever on Monday) — loom larger than corresponding gains, according to those who study behavioral economics. In other words, losing 7% of your money hurts twice as much [as the pleasure of] making 7%. So, it’s normal, it’s human nature, that you’re in panic mode. But don’t act on your panic. Or at least don’t panic sell. Source
- “If investors were happy with their asset allocation on Thursday, they should find stocks more attractive today. Of course, investors sometimes are asleep at the wheel and a periodic wake-up call can be useful, but prices are just back to where they were a couple weeks ago, so why panic?,” Source
- We’ve had 15 straight months without a monthly loss in U.S. equity markets. Source
- The 665-point decline in the Dow Jones Industrial Average on Friday was the largest since June 2016. However, back in 2016, the Dow declined about 5%, and Friday’s drop was 2.5%. Source
- And while Monday’s drop was the biggest point drop ever, it still pales in comparison to the largest daily percentage losses: On Oct. 19, 1987, the Dow fell 22.61% and on Oct. 28, 1929 the Dow fell 12.82%. By contrast, Monday’s drop was 4.6%. Source
“Who knows” was my answer when I was recently asked about my own outlook on the markets for 2018.
Over the last few weeks, my inbox has been flooded by dozens if not a hundred market outlooks by prominent research firms, economists, and strategists. And they are all completely different. Some see significant stock market appreciation while others see little to no growth. Some see more growth in the US than abroad. Others see more growth in the foreign markets than in the US. Some see rising rates to be an issue. Others do not. And some even predict a negative year for the stock market. Chances are they are all wrong!
They are interesting to skim through to understand what they believe are the biggest issues to occur in 2018. But it’s just as fascinating to see what is not included in their outlooks. There are even some research groups that make a living by reading through old Market Outlooks and calling out all the wrong predictions.
Think back to this time last year. Trump was just sworn into office and it seemed like everyone was waiting for some kind of market correction to occur. But it didn’t! Volatility is now way down. Markets have shrugged off much of the bad news that has come out in recent months (such as North Korea). Any market outlook that expressed these kinds of views would have been quickly dismissed if written in early 2017.
It’s a reminder to stay focused on your investment strategy. There is a lot of noise that distracts investors and all to0 often leads them into making poor investment decisions.
With all of our clients who have children, planning for college expenses is the one of the biggest concerns that keeps them up at night. Retirement planning may be a bigger issue in the long term, but the children will be going to college a lot sooner than their parents will retire.
As I work on putting together plans for clients to balance their own retirement and send their kids to a good college, I find myself stepping back wondering how college became so expensive. Since the mid 1980s, the cost of college has increased 500%! And it continues to grow faster than inflation. Today’s students are graduating with a mountain of debt. In fact, there is now more student loan debt than credit card debt.
Just look at this chart to see how out of control college costs have gotten over the last twenty years:
What does this chart say? Over the last twenty years, items in blue have actually gotten cheaper. TV’s, software, toys, cars and clothing are all cheaper than they were twenty years ago. The items in red, such as housing, food, health care, childcare and COLLEGE have gotten more expensive over the years. As much as we complain about the escalating cost of healthcare, it’s not nearly as bad as college.
How did we arrive at this problem? A simple answer is that money is freely available for people to borrow to pay for college. The cost does not become a big driver in the decision making process when there are grants, scholarships, tax credits, and even loans involved that mitigate the financial bite. This results in universities having to offer more services, bigger buildings, better facilities, etc in an effort to attract students who are not as cost conscious as before.
With the government stepping in to provide assistance (loans and tax credits), they are actually contributing to the problem and making it worse. They are creating a gap between the perceived cost a student pays to go to college and the actual cost to attend.
This happened with real estate when the government wanted everyone to own their own home – loans and incentives fueled the market. The good intentions of the government backfired as people were given mortgages they couldn’t actually afford, which spurred housing prices to soar… for a while at least.
A similar problem exists in health insurance. The insured are insulated from the true cost of a service because the health insurance pays for most of the expenses incurred.
If you’re interested in reading more about this and seeing the kinds of solutions that might work, I found this article to be a fascinating read on the subject of college costs.
Republicans and Democrats each make strong and compelling arguments as to why their approach and strategy will be better than their opponent. The media, think tanks, and experts are constantly making solid arguments for one candidate or the other. And in many cases these arguments and research findings conflict with each other.
Conventional wisdom suggests that a Republican President will do a better job helping businesses grow, which will in turn increase the return on your investments. Yet, the Democrats have released some interesting information that suggest otherwise.
Lots of research supports the idea that the stock market (and your investments) do better when the incumbent party keeps the office. And yet, there seems to be many exceptions to that statistic when one factors in market volatility or look at a wider time frame.
So how do we as investors and voters determine if it’s better to have a Democrat or Republican in the White House when everything appears to be shades of grey?
If there’s no clear research showing that one party is better for the stock market than the other, chances are there is no statistically significant correlation. In other words: The presidential election itself has little bearing on investment performance. And all of these headlines, articles and research we read pushing one candidate over the other may just be marketing fodder.
Here are a few strategies to keep in mind over the next few months:
- Expect volatility as the election draws near. The markets do not like it when there are looming questions about the future direction of the country. Most likely this volatility is short term and will clear up as investors digest the implications of one president over the other. This will be especially true if the candidates target a particular industry (such as health care or defense)
- Remember you are a long-term investor. Much of the noise and headlines will not have a long term impact on your investment future.
- Stay the course with your investment strategy. The candidates, their respective parties, think-tanks, experts, pundits and the media will try very hard to rattle your cage to sway your opinion and to get your vote. They will use fear tactics or they will paint rosy pictures of the future. And unfortunately, many investors will make poor investment choices prior to the election. They will move to cash if they are afraid or they will move into an asset class they believe will soar if their candidate wins.
- Any significant policy changes will take months to develop and potential a year to roll out.
We can’t help but hear about the election on the news. And when it comes to each candidates economic policies, we are quick to imagine how it will affect our investments. We assume that Trump’s determination to bring jobs back to the US could boost US stock prices and perhaps hurt foreign stock prices. We think that because Clinton has talked about reform on Wall Street, that financial companies would be hurt if she were elected President.
But the connection isn’t as clear as the media makes it out to be. Both politics and the markets are very complex systems with many, many moving parts. We are quick to arrive at various conclusions as to cause and effect. Or quick to identify patterns. In reality, it’s nearly impossible to predict how presidential policies will affect the stock market. We may think we see a pattern or understand cause and effect, but there could be more factors contributing to the expected outcome
All of these thoughts can be connected to a set of common investing errors that are discussed in a growing field of behavioral economics. The following article does a great job of capturing some of these elements
Recently we introduced The Money Management Tool to help clients better organize their financial lives. The tool has lots of features and we will occasional explain how some of the features are being used by our clients (or should be used) to help them reach their financial goals.
This post will deal with a client who is trying to save for college.
Situation: A client recently had a child and wanted to start saving for her college education. He is a hands-on client who likes to dig into the numbers himself and run multiple scenarios. His concern was: “If I fund my child’s education, how will it impact my retirement plans?”
Problem: He didn’t have a framework to think through the various scenarios. All the calculators he found online were too simple and lacking the detail he needed.
Solution: The Money Management Tool provides a suite of workshops to help people just like my client. There is a specific workshop to help clients plan for college. He was able quickly enter his assumptions to see what the outcome would be for him. From there, it offered some options to help him reach his goal. Once he was satisfied with his plan, he was able to pull me into the process to make sure it made sense.