Sign up with your email address to be the first to know about new products, VIP offers, blog features & more.

Why Americans Don’t Own As Much Stock As They Used To

At first glance, the trend of stock ownership in the US is quite declining.  It appears that for most Americans, the percentage of stock in a portfolio is less and less.  That’s scary… but there is more to this story than just another post about investors sitting in cash.

How much stick do investors own

 

What explains the declining ownership of stocks? In part, it’s the following:

  1. It’s a lack of confidence in the market. Fear of another recession or another bear market. That’s not new.
  2. Over the last 10-15 years, there have been a lot more products and asset classes available that simply weren’t available in the 60s, 70s or 80s. There are now more investment options than ever before available to investors.  Stocks and bonds are no longer the only game in town.
  3. Americans (and Europeans, and Japanese) are aging and becoming more conservative with their investments.

 

The Illusion of Wealth

What’s worth more to you: a lump sum of $100,000 or an income stream of $500 per month?

If you’re like most investors, you would pick the $100,000 as being worth more.  In reality, $100,000 can buy an income stream of about $500/month, which means they are worth about the same.

It is much easier for investors to understand what $500 a month can buy versus $100,000.  Investors do not deal with those large numbers on a frequent basis and mistakenly overvalue it causing an illusion of wealth.  It seems like $500/mo is a lot less, but it’s not.

Because of these misperceptions, it’s important to continue to plan for retirement and how the various scenarios might unfold.

 

Power of Innovation (Follow Up)

American Funds recently wrote about innovation from a different angle than from my original post: the benefit to the innovative company.  Here are a few highlights:

“The markets often underestimate the impact innovation can have on a company’s growth prospects and future cash flows” – Steve Watson, Portfolio Manager at American Funds.

The technology industry is not the only area investors should look toward for innovative companies.  They can be found in some of the most stable industries.

Thomson Reuters tracks the top 100 Global Innovators and found that spent over $223 billion on R&D but their aggregate performance beat the S&P 500 by 4%.

At the end of the day, innovation is affecting our daily lives.  It has changed the way we shop (e-commerce), the way we communicate (smartphones), and the way we use energy (LED light bulbs) to name just a few. And if that’s not enough, investing in innovative companies may have a positive effect on your portfolio.

 

Bonds and then Bonds.

The Federal Reserve responded to the financial crisis by dropping interest rates to zero (ZIRP) and by buying massive quantities of bonds and thus flooding the banks with newly created cash. We were told it would short lived. However, five plus years later it is still mostly with us because we are told that the economy is fine but only by a little. Therefore, faced with a banking system flush with cash and the average investor desperate for yield, there has been a multiyear rally in bonds. This rally was interrupted last spring but has since remained calm at marginally higher rates. While this calm lasts, it is important to review what are bonds, and what are bonds.

Bonds have a credit rating. The credit rating is based on the ability of the lending organization to repay the money lent to them. Standard and Poor is a leading bond rating service. Their ratings run from AAA to CCC or lower. AAA are the highest quality bonds. BBB and up are referred to as ‘investment grade’. Investment grade bonds have adequate to extremely strong capacity, depending on their rating, to both meet their dividend payments and return your capital. CCC’s are considered “vulnerable”.

Link to Standard and Poors

This is important because the recent years of yield chasing have dropped the yield on BB and lower bonds to record lows. In addition, these ‘junk’ bonds command a higher premium over their investment grade brothers. Investors rightly required a much higher dividend yield to compensate them for their higher risk. However, this premium is now near historic lows. This makes them vulnerable on two fronts. First, all bonds suffer a decline in current market price if interest rates rise. Second, their current market price will decline if the outlook for their financial stability worsens. So, you have to ask yourself; “Is the extra dividend yield worth the risk?”.

Link to the SF Fed

So there are bonds and there are bonds. It is important that you know which ones you own.

Why I Hate Headlines

With headlines like “Stocks hit all time high”, “Breaking Records: Dow and S&P 500”, or “It Looks Like The Economy is About To Roar”, you might expect to see a remarkable chart showing lots of growth.

But not this time.  Far from it.

After a stellar 2013, the US stock market has limped into 2014.  Perhaps the media is grasping at straws in an effort to keep viewers engaged.  Those headlines sure make things look great.  But the charts tell a different story.

Time Will Tell

While the stock market continues to remain orderly, there have been some recent changes. The prices of many of the momentum stocks, which are long on promise and short on earnings, are down 50% or more so far this year. The iron law of valuation always wins. Fortunately, the stock prices of large traditional companies are holding (keeping many stock index returns slightly positive for the year). This could be a return of rationality, which bodes well going forward. While the valuation of the broad market is still rich, it is still well below previous extremes. It looks like it is headed higher.

Recent numbers on the state of the economy are mixed at best. The early report on first quarter GDP came in flat. The unemployment rate has improved substantially, but this is due to a decline in the U.S. labor-force participation rate. The stock market advance continues without much support from the economic fundamentals. Perhaps stock investors are looking ahead, optimistic about what they anticipate. For example, new technologies in natural gas production are boosting the oil & gas industry. These technologies are increasing domestic supplies, dramatically lowering energy costs and therefore potentially igniting a domestic manufacturing renaissance. Other technologies, too numerous to itemize, are also changing the world for the better. Innovations have become commonplace and, in past, solutions from seemingly nowhere have solved the challenges we faced. Why not this time, again.

Then there are bonds. Last year the interest rate on the 10-year Treasury spiked to 3% at year-end from an epic low of 1.75%. This left the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Bond Index with a loss of 3.4% and the Barclays U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index with a loss of 8.6%. So far this year, the interest rate of the 10-year Treasury has dropped back down to about 2.6%, resulting in higher year-to-date bond prices. The Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Bond Index is up about 2.6% and Barclays U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index is up almost 3.8% this year. This is not something that normally happens in an improving economy. Rates should be going up and bond prices down; especially with the Fed’s Quantitative Easing bond buying program pulling back. However, rates are so far stable to down and bond prices are up. Perhaps higher bond prices are the result of the shortage caused by the years of the Fed’s bond buying. Or perhaps it is because our bonds look attractive relative to those globally. U.S. Treasuries are still seen by the world as a safe haven. Therefore, bonds look attractive for now despite interest rates remaining near historic lows.

The markets remain orderly. However, as always, participate with caution.

The Miraculous Effects of Innovation

About 12-13 years ago, no one could turn on the TV or read an article about current events that did not talk about an energy shortage.

Fear was gripping the nation that one day soon the world would run out of oil.  Charts were posted showing that at current consumption levels, we had 50 years or so of oil left . China and India with their surging economies and rising middle class were going to create such demand on this “limited” resource that it would cripple growth in this country. OPEC was adjusting the pricing of oil in part for political purposes. We were in a sense held hostage.

And the government’s solution to all of these problems at first was: Soybeans?!

It was during this time that I saw someone speak on this topic and his prophetic words rang true years later. He said “We will never run out of oil.  There is plenty of it in the ground but it is just too expensive to extract right now. As the price climbs and technology improves, supply will start to increase.  Between us and Canada, we could be energy independent.”

Look at where we’ve come in such a short period of time.  Technology advancements have opened up oil reserves that were impossible to access only a few years before. It has been a long time since an OPEC meeting made news.  We are expected to be energy independent in just a few short years.

So why were we so fearful and afraid?

As Matt Ridly of WSJ notes, static limits do not factor  innovation. “Ecologists can’t seem to see that when whale oil starts to run out, petroleum is discovered, or that when farm yields flatten, fertilizer comes along, or that when glass fiber is invented, demand for copper falls.”

This phenomenon deals with all sorts of resources: Natural gas, gold, phosphorus, silicon, forests, water, food, and dozens of others. One case after another exemplifies human innovation solving epic problems.

Perhaps Julian Simons is correct that the ultimate resource is the human mind.